1. Two analysts are discussing shareholder defenses against hostile takeovers. Alice states, “It is positive for shareholders that the board has shown a willingness to buy back shares from holders who may be in a position to effect a hostile takeover of the firm at less than its long-term value to shareholders.” Bradley states, “Firms that are likely takeover targets should offer valuable exit packages in the event of a hostile takeover because they are necessary to recruit highly talented top executives, such as the CEO.” From the perspective of good corporate governance, are these statements correct?